|
It is 100% certain you're headed for Hell ...
for rejecting the Catholic Dogma ...
Warning: There are no bishops or priests in these times
1. The Original Sin of Adam closed Heaven for all men (sanctifying grace was lost) ... Hell became the only possible destination for the immortal souls of men.
7. One can still be Catholic and get to Heaven with a proper baptism in water
[Section 7] ... believing the Dogmas ... and keeping free from mortal sin. [Section 10.1]
E-mail > Slave_BVM@mail.com -- Catholic-Dogma-Providers@mail.com
<<< --- <<< --- <<<
--- <<< --- Start Section 8.6.3 ---
>>> --- >>> --- >>> --- >>>
Sources of Dogma that the orthodox ... helped to define ... prior
Sources of Dogma that the orthodox ... helped to define ... prior
Sources of Dogma that the orthodox ... helped to define ... prior
Catholic Faith (pre-fulfillment) writing of Ecclesiasticus 24:44
Catholic writing of 2 Saint John 1:9
Catholic Faith (pre-fulfillment) writing of Ecclesiasticus 2:14 ~ ~ ~
Introduction:
1a. The "orthodox" claim ... their local "non-Ecumenical council" (non-worldwide) at Constantinople ... can legislate for the worldwide Catholic Church. This is completely illogical. As the "orthodox" continue to lie ... to this day that "their council" of 879-880 A.D. was an "Ecumenical Council".
1b. The "orthodox" of the late 800's ... apparently forgot how to count. The Catholic Church held ... the Church's 8th Ecumenical Council in 869-870 A.D. ... and called it the Fourth Council of Constantinople.
1c. The "orthodox" then called their local gathering of 879-880 A.D. ... get ready ... the 8th Ecumenical Council and the Fourth Council of Constantinople.
2. Groups can have local Councils but they must support and the defend the Sources of Dogma of the universal Church ... where applicable, depending on the issues addressed at the local Council.
3a. Catholic Ignatius became Patriarch of Constantinople in 847 A.D. ... and was a long standing Patriarch.
3b. Emperor Michael III ... removed Ignatius from being Patriarch in 857 A.D. ... because Ignatius would not try to have Michael's mother retire to a convent as she was Regent of the Empire because ... Michael was a minor (made Emperor when he was two years old).
4a. Bishop Ignatius was illicitly removed ... and a layman (non-Churchman) ... Photius was placed as the next "patriarch" of Constantinople. This was after ... Photius went from being a "layman to Bishop" in five days (10 years is a normal minimum).
4b. Photius was excommunicated from the Catholic Church at the real Fourth Council of Constantinople by decree in 870 A.D. ... as a heretic and usurper.
5. Pope Nicholas I ... sent correspondence to the eastern patriarchs (Antioch, Alexandria, Jerusalem), forbidding them to recognize Photius the usurper.
6. Emperor Basil's first action was to restore ... Ignatius to be Patriarch again in 867 A.D. and he remained so until he died in 877 A.D.
7. Incomprehensibly Emperor Basil places ... the excommunicated heretic Photius "back as patriarch" in 877 A.D. until 886 A.D.
~ ~ ~
This section includes ...
Sub-part A: First Century Catholic authored Scriptures showing that the Holy Spirit proceeds from both the Father and the Son. Pope John VIII at the time of the fake "orthodox council" in 879-880 A.D. ... would not have gone against these scriptures ... showing that his letter to the "council" was falsified and made into a forgery. Photius was a known forger.
S u b - p a r t A First century Catholic authored scriptures on the dual procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son ... that Pope John VIII would ... not have written against. His "Letter #350" is now widely accepted as being a forgery ~ ~ ~
1. Pope John VIII would not have written against ... these First Century Catholic writings that the Catholic Holy Spirit proceeds from both ... the Father and the Son.
2. This leads to the logical conclusion ... that Photius and his co-conspirators ... altered the John VIII letter making it a forgery ... or the "orthodox" heretics even originating the letter themselves.
3a. Across the internet ... what is known as Letter #350 is widely ... considered a forgery. Even a heretic "eastern orthodox" website admits this. The letter is not even mentioned in any Greek writings before the year 1,400.
3b. The "letter" in question ... was not even included in the text of the fake "orthodox" council ... why not ? One would think this would have been a very BIG deal. One possible reason: The letter was made up in the 1400's around the same time ... that the "orthodox" thankfully resolved their Filioque heresy at the Council of Florence.
4. Photius forged a letter out of whole cloth ... "a letter by Pope Nicholas" ... by which Nicholas "absolved him from past illicit actions."
5. This is all typical heretic derangement that has been going on for 2,000 years.
- - - - - - - - - -
Catholic writing of Saint John 16:13-14 >
Note 1: Jesus identifying that the Holy Spirit is ... "of mine" ... and that all the Father has (that is the procession of the Holy Spirit) are Christ's also.
Note 2: Clearly shows the dual procession of the Holy Spirit. Catholic writing of Romans 20:22 > ""When He (Jesus) had said this, He (Jesus) breathed on them; and He (Jesus) said to them: Receive ye the Holy Spirit."
Note: Jesus sending the Holy Spirit to the world in the person of the disciples.
Catholic writing of Romans 8:9 > "But you are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of His."
Note 1: The Spirit of God (the Holy Spirit) of the first sentence of Romans 8:9 ... is also identified as the Spirit of Christ in the next sentence.
Note 2: Indentifies the dual procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son. Catholic writing of Saint John 16:7 > "But I tell you the truth: it is expedient to you that I go: for if I go not, the Paraclete will not come to you; but if I go, I will send Him to you."
Note: Jesus stating that He will send the Holy Spirit ... demonstrates the proceeding of the Holy Spirit from the Son as well as the Father.
Catholic writing of Philippians 1:19 > "For I know that this shall fall out to me unto salvation, through your prayer, and the supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ."
Note: The Holy Spirit being identified as the Spirit of Jesus Christ ... demonstrates the dual procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son.
Catholic writing of Galatians 4:6 > "And because you are sons, God hath sent the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying: Abba, Father."
Note: The Holy Spirit being identified as the Spirit of the Son also ... demonstrates the dual procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son.
Catholic writing of Saint Luke 24:49 > "And I send the promise of My Father upon you: but stay you in the city till you be endued with power from on high."
Note: Jesus stating that He will send the Holy Spirit ... demonstrates the proceeding of the Holy Spirit from the Son as well as the Father.
Catholic writing in Acts of the Apostles 16:6-7 > 6: "And when they had passed through Phrygia, and the country of Galatia, they were forbidden by the Holy Spirit to preach the word in Asia. 7: "And when they were come into Mysia, they attempted to go into Bythynia, and the Spirit of Jesus suffered them not."
Note: The ... Spirit of Jesus of Verse 7 ... is identified as the Holy Spirit in Verse 6.
Catholic writing of 1 Corinthians 2:11 > "For what man knoweth the things of a man, but the spirit of a man that is in him ? So the things also that are of God no man knoweth, but the Spirit of God."
Note 1: God the Father and God the Son are both fully God. The Holy Spirit here is referred to as "the Spirit of God" ... not just the Spirit of the Father ... so that Catholic Saint Paul attributes to the Holy Spirit the same relation to the Son as to the Father.
Note 2: This identifies the dual Procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son.
S u b - p a r t B Photius was automatically excommunicated ... and, of course, not made a Bishop by ... Gregory Asbestas of Syracuse because Gregory himself was excommunicated from the Catholic Church for other reasons ~ ~ ~
The following caused ... Photius to be automatically excommunicated from the Catholic Church ...
1. The illicit act of looking like he was being made a Bishop ... by an excommunicated consecrator (former Bishop Gregory).
2. The illicit act of looking like he was being ... asigned to a Bishop's office ... which was currently occupied by another (Bishop Ignatius).
3. The illicit act of looking like he was being made a Priest ... by the excommunicated Gregory of Syracuse.
4. The illicit act of seeking to be made ... a bishop without having kept the interstices (time intervals between ranks ... sub-deacon, deacon, priest, etc.). Photius was rushed through from being a layman to ... what "looked like" a Bishop in 5 days ... instead of 10 years.
5. Both Gregory and Photius were automatically excommunicated for being in violation of the following two ... Sources of Dogma which the "orthodox", to this day, say they *accept* as infallible Dogma ...
- - - - -
Second Council of Nicaea, Definition section, 787 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > - - - - -
First Council of Nicaea, Profession of Faith, Article 2, 325 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > - - - - -
Emperor Michael III and Photius ... both tried to obtain recognition of Photius as "patriarch" ... from Pope Nicholas I.
Pope Nicholas could not and did not ... employ Papal Jurisdiction to confirm what had taken place against Catholic Dogma regarding Ignatius and Photius ... because Nicholas himself would have fallen automatically excommunicated ... see Section 13.3.1.
S u b - p a r t C Excommunication and other citations against Photius at the real ... Fourth Council of Constantinople (869-870 A.D.) ~ ~ ~
Fourth Council of Constantinople, Canon 4, 870 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
Note 1: This Canon 4 shows that there was an automatic excommunication of heretic Photius at some point before ... what looked like his consecration as a Catholic Bishop ... this is the very reason why he was never a bishop.
Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council. Fourth Council of Constantinople, Canon 25, 870 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > The Holy Synod has duly decided that the bishops, priests, deacons and subdeacons of the great Church (of Constantinople]), who received their consecration from Methodius and Ignatius, the most Holy Patriarchs, and became hard of heart like the arrogant and unfeeling heart of Pharaoh, and even now are in complete disagreement with this Holy and Universal Synod and, while rejecting harmony with us in the word of truth, have wholeheartedly supported the cause of the usurper Photius, must be deposed and suspended from all sacerdotal functions, just as the most blessed Pope Nicholas decreed not long ago. Fourth Council of Constantinople, Canon 2, 870 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "Everything which has been expounded and promulgated by them in a Synod at various times, both for the defence and well-being of the Church of Constantinople and of its chief priest, namely Ignatius, its most Holy Patriarch, as well as for the expulsion and condemnation of Photius, the upstart and usurper, should be maintained and observed together with the Canons there set forth, unchanged and unaltered, and no bishop, priest or deacon or anyone from the ranks of the clergy should dare to overturn or reject any of these things.
Note 1: This Canon 2 ... proves that it was more forgery ... that Pope John VIII agreed to recognize Photius as "patriarch" in any letters ... after he became Pope in 872 A.D. ... which was seven years before the "orthodox" lies about "Photius being recognized by Rome".
Note 2: Crucial > Pope John VIII would not have violated this Canon 2 ... which John VIII himself helped author and approve while he was Archdeacon of the Roman Church. John VIII knew that violating this Canon 2 ... would have caused his automatic excommunication from the Catholic Church.
Note 3: Section 3.3 lists ... 29 Sources of Dogma that the Catholic Faith is defined by ... the citations of the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world. Fourth Council of Constantinople, Paragraph 13, 870 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "We have cut out with the sword of the spirit the roots of scandals and weeds along with their shoots, as we establish the truly innocent and most Holy Patriarch Ignatius in the controlling seat, while we condemn Photius, the interloper and illegal occupier with all his supporters and promoters of evil." Fourth Council of Constantinople, Paragraph 10, 870 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "For he (Photius) ... engineered the expulsion of the most just, lawful and canonically appointed high priest of the Church of Constantinople, namely the most holy Patriarch Ignatius, and like an adulterous robber, breaking into his See and repeatedly submitting him to a thousand charges involving dethronement and as many anathemas, he roused continuous turmoil and storms for all the Churches of Christ our Saviour, in a multiplicity of ways." Fourth Council of Constantinople, Paragraph 14, 870 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "For the wretched Photius was truly like the person who did not make God his refuge; but trusted in the abundance of his cunning and sought refuge in the vanity of his iniquities, following the example of Ephraim of old." Fourth Council of Constantinople, Paragraph 14, 870 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "For Photius was lifted up to the heights of arrogance in attacking the most blessed Pope of old Rome, Nicholas, and he vomited out the poison of his evil. He gathered together false vicars from three supposedly eastern Sees, set up what was thought to be a synodical council, and, making lists of the names of accusers and witnesses, fashioning profiles and speeches which seemed to be suited to each person who plays a part in a synodical investigation, and making up, writing down and organizing forged records as accounts of those proceedings, he had the audacity to anathematize the aforementioned most blessed Pope Nicholas and all those in communion with him.
Note: This Source of Dogma identifying the dogmatic fact ... that the "orthodox council" of 878-880 A.D. ... was not a council of the Catholic Church.
Fourth Council of Constantinople, Canon 25, 870 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > The Holy Synod has duly decided that the bishops, priests, deacons and subdeacons of the great Church (of Constantinople]), who received their consecration from Methodius and Ignatius, the most Holy Patriarchs, and became hard of heart like the arrogant and unfeeling heart of Pharaoh, and even now are in complete disagreement with this Holy and Universal Synod and, while rejecting harmony with us in the word of truth, have wholeheartedly supported the cause of the usurper Photius, must be deposed and suspended from all sacerdotal functions, just as the most blessed Pope Nicholas decreed not long ago. Fourth Council of Constantinople, Paragraph 10, 870 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > He (Photius) has not ceased from contriving numerous arrests and imprisonments, confiscations of property, protracted periods of exile and, in addition to these, accusations, charges, false testimonies and forgeries against all who worked for true religion and fought for the truth."
S u b - p a r t D The "orthodox" ... confirm that the Catholic Church is the Apostolic Church in the first seven Ecumenical Councils.
Which means the Catholic Church ... defines the Apostolic Faith worldwide ... not ~ ~ ~
First Council of Nicaea, Profession of Faith, Article 2, 325 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
Note 1: The "orthodox" by accepting the above Dogma (which the orthodox helped define) ... confirm ... that the Catholic Church is the Apostolic Church ... which means it defines the Apostolic Faith.
Note 2: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that the "orthodox council" of 879-880 A.D. ... can declare as invalid the Catholic Fourth Council of Constantinople of 869-870 A.D. ... whose Canons are still in force. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 3: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that Photius was ever the Patriarch of Constantinople ... no matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 4: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that the Catholic Holy Spirit proceeds only from the Father ... but proceeds from both the Father and the Son in a dual procession ... which the rogue "orthodox council" heretically denied. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter. First Council of Constantinople, Canon 7, 381 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "Those who embrace orthodoxy and join the number of those who are being saved from the heretics, we receive ... when they hand in statements and anathematise every heresy which is not of the same mind as the Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church of God."
Note 1: The "orthodox" by accepting the above Dogma (which the orthodox helped define) ... confirm ... that the Catholic Church is the Apostolic Church ... which means it defines the Apostolic Faith.
Note 2: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that the "orthodox council" of 879-880 A.D. ... can declare as invalid the Catholic Fourth Council of Constantinople of 869-870 A.D. ... whose Canons are still in force. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 3: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that Photius was ever the Patriarch of Constantinople ... no matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 4: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that the Catholic Holy Spirit proceeds only from the Father ... but proceeds from both the Father and the Son in a dual procession ... which the rogue "orthodox council" heretically denied. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter. Council of Chalcedon, Session 19, Canon 29, Pope Leo, 451 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "The ... representatives of the Apostolic See of Rome, replied: It is sacrilege to reduce a bishop to the rank of priest. But if whatever cause there is for removing those persons from the exercise of episcopacy is just, they ought not to occupy the position even of a priest."
Note 1: The "orthodox" by accepting the above Dogma (which the orthodox helped define) ... confirm ... that the Catholic Church is the Apostolic Church ... which means it defines the Apostolic Faith.
Note 2: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that the "orthodox council" of 879-880 A.D. ... can declare as invalid the Catholic Fourth Council of Constantinople of 869-870 A.D. ... whose Canons are still in force. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 3: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that Photius was ever the Patriarch of Constantinople ... no matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 4: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that the Catholic Holy Spirit proceeds only from the Father ... but proceeds from both the Father and the Son in a dual procession ... which the rogue "orthodox council" heretically denied. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter. Second Council of Constantinople, Three Chapters section, 553 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "Furthermore, we condemn and anathematize, along with all other heretics who have been condemned and anathematized by the same four Holy Councils and by the Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church."
Note 1: The "orthodox" by accepting the above Dogma (which the orthodox helped define) ... confirm ... that the Catholic Church is the Apostolic Church ... which means it defines the Apostolic Faith.
Note 2: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that the "orthodox council" of 879-880 A.D. ... can declare as invalid the Catholic Fourth Council of Constantinople of 869-870 A.D. ... whose Canons are still in force. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 3: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that Photius was ever the Patriarch of Constantinople ... no matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 4: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that the Catholic Holy Spirit proceeds only from the Father ... but proceeds from both the Father and the Son in a dual procession ... which the rogue "orthodox council" heretically denied. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter. First Council of Nicaea, Profession of Faith, Article 2, 325 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "And those who say ... that the Son of God is subject to change or alteration these the Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematises."
Note 1: The "orthodox" by accepting the above Dogma (which the orthodox helped define) ... confirm ... that the Catholic Church is the Apostolic Church ... which means it defines the Apostolic Faith.
Note 2: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that the "orthodox council" of 879-880 A.D. ... can declare as invalid the Catholic Fourth Council of Constantinople of 869-870 A.D. ... whose Canons are still in force. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 3: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that Photius was ever the Patriarch of Constantinople ... no matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 4: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that the Catholic Holy Spirit proceeds only from the Father ... but proceeds from both the Father and the Son in a dual procession ... which the rogue "orthodox council" heretically denied. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter. First Council of Constantinople, Expositions of the 150 Fathers, 381 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "We believe in one God the Father all-powerful, Maker of Heaven and of earth (...) in One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church."
Note 1: The "orthodox" by accepting the above Dogma (which the orthodox helped define) ... confirm ... that the Catholic Church is the Apostolic Church ... which means it defines the Apostolic Faith.
Note 2: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that the "orthodox council" of 879-880 A.D. ... can declare as invalid the Catholic Fourth Council of Constantinople of 869-870 A.D. ... whose Canons are still in force. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 3: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that Photius was ever the Patriarch of Constantinople ... no matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 4: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith ... that the Catholic Holy Spirit proceeds only from the Father ... but proceeds from both the Father and the Son in a dual procession ... which the rogue "orthodox council" heretically denied. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter. Second Council of Nicaea, Definition section, 787 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma > "Given ... the God-spoken teaching of our holy fathers and the tradition of the Catholic Church - for we recognize that this tradition comes from the Holy Spirit who dwells in her."
Note 1: The "orthodox" by accepting the above Dogma (which the orthodox helped define) ... confirm ... that the Catholic Church is the Apostolic Church where the Holy Spirit dwells ... which means it defines the Apostolic Faith.
Note 2: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith of the Holy Spirit ... that the "orthodox council" of 879-880 A.D. ... can declare as invalid the Catholic Fourth Council of Constantinople of 869-870 A.D. ... whose Canons are still in force. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 3: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith of the Holy Spirit ... that Photius was ever the Patriarch of Constantinople ... no matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter.
Note 4: This identifies ... that it is not the Apostolic Faith of the Holy Spirit ... that the Catholic Holy Spirit proceeds only from the Father ... but proceeds from both the Father and the Son in a dual procession ... which the rogue "orthodox council" heretically denied. No matter what the "orthodox" non-Apostolic "council" of 879-880 A.D. ... said on this matter. ~ ~ ~ ~
<<< --- <<< --- <<<
--- <<< --- End Section 8.6.3 --- >>> ---
>>> --- >>> --- >>>
Immaculate Heart of Mary ~ Our Lady of Good Remedy ~ Our Lady of La Salette ~
Immaculate Heart of Mary ~ Wear the Brown Scapular as the Blessed Virgin instructed us ... as Our Lady of Mount Carmel ~
Truth of the super-natural order:
Ignorance of God's Catholic Dogma ... which is being aggressively hidden with malice ... is not a "loophole" into Heaven.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
